Legal Opinion
State of New Hampshire v. Stephen Socci
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 8, 2014No. 2013-0182PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Stephen Socci, appeals an order of the Superior Court (.Delker, J.) denying his motion to suppress evidence leading to his convictions, following a bench trial upon stipulated facts, on charges of manufacturing a controlled drug and possession of a controlled drug with intent to sell. See RSA 318-B:2,1 (2011). He argues that the court erred in denying the motion because the evidence resulted from: (1) an unlawful search of his property; and (2) a subsequent consent to search that was given involuntarily and/or tainted by the prior unlawful search. We vacate and remand.
The trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of New Hampshire v. Amy Kathleen MouserSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. Abhishek SachdevSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- State v. Robert Grimpson SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State of New Hampshire v. Darlene WashburnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018