Legal Opinion

State of New Hampshire v. Darlene Washburn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 13, 2018No. 2016-0518Published

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Darlene Washburn, was convicted of possession of a schedule II controlled drug. See RSA 318-B:2 (2011) (amended 2013, 2015, 2016). On appeal, she argues that the Trial Court ( Houran , J.) erred when it: (1) denied her motion to suppress evidence seized in warrantless searches of her purse, vehicle, and home; and (2) instructed the jury on a lesser-included offense that did not ensure jury unanimity and failed to protect her against double jeopardy. We affirm.

The issues raised by the defendant address two rulings made by the trial court at different…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API