Legal Opinion

The Upper Deck Company v. Miller

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 16, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01936Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, CASE NO. C23-1936-KKE 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND 10 RYAN MILLER et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 Defendants. 12 This is a copyright infringement case between competitors in the trading card game 13 industry. The Upper Deck Company (“Upper Deck”) alleges its former contractor, Defendant 14 Ryan Miller, went to work for its competitor, Defendant Ravensburger North America, Inc. 15 (“Ravensburger”), under false…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API