Legal Opinion

State v. Sickler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1983No. 13867PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Shelby Sickler, Sr., appeals from a judgment of conviction for aggravated assault. We affirm.

The first issue is whether the trial court properly denied defense motions for a directed verdict based on insufficiency of the evidence. Appellant was charged with, and convicted of, violating SDCL 22-18-1.1(3), which states:

Any person who: ... (3) Attempts to cause or knowingly causes any bodily injury to a law enforcement officer or other public officer engaged in the performance of his duties ... is guilty of aggravated assault.

We agree with appellant that since…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. PeleloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. State v. JudgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Estate of Billings v. Deadwood Congregation of Jehovah WitnessesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SvihlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jameson v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. ArguelloSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Estate of DimondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API