State v. Sickler
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Shelby Sickler, Sr., appeals from a judgment of conviction for aggravated assault. We affirm.
The first issue is whether the trial court properly denied defense motions for a directed verdict based on insufficiency of the evidence. Appellant was charged with, and convicted of, violating SDCL 22-18-1.1(3), which states:
Any person who: ... (3) Attempts to cause or knowingly causes any bodily injury to a law enforcement officer or other public officer engaged in the performance of his duties ... is guilty of aggravated assault.
We agree with appellant that since…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. PeleloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State v. JudgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Estate of Billings v. Deadwood Congregation of Jehovah WitnessesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SvihlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Jameson v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ArguelloSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Estate of DimondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.