Legal Opinion

Casey v. L. M. Pike & Son

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 28, 1963No. 5111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

Manchester Sand Gravel & Cement Company, employer of plaintiff’s intestate, Edward D. Casey, was the prime contractor in the reconstruction of a portion of Route 10 in Enfield. Defendant Pike was a subcontractor doing the asphalt paving on the road which at the site of the accident consisted of three lanes each 12 feet in width. There was a shoulder on the east side estimated to be 8 to 10 feet wide which was being built entirely by the prime contractor.

On November 5, 1959, the day of the accident, the westerly and center lanes of the road were closed to public travel. There was one-way…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Greer Transportation Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Parrish v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. Petersen v. JansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McTeer v. Clarkson Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Stephenson v. StarksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API