Legal Opinion

Busk v. Lowrie

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1893No. 60PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in an appeal from. Coleman County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

Starkweather had a body of land enclosed in Coleman County as a pasture, which embraced the lands in controversy, with a fence running east and west so as to divide it into two pastures. He sold to appellant that portion of the land lying north of the fence in 1886. Starkweather did not know that the land in controversy was vacant when he enclosed it; neither did Busk know that fact when he purchased it. There was, however, a vacancy of 234 acres between two surveys inside the enclosure. Busk discovered, in 1886, that the land was vacant, and located a certificate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. MossTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Burleson v. DurhamTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cravens v. BrookeTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Turner v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Thomas v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gracey v. HendrixTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Murphy v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Hardman v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lee v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Waggoner v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API