Legal Opinion
Malik v. Senkowski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 13, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violent conduct, disturbing the facility, refusing a direct order, verbal harassment and possessing an altered item. He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination on a number of grounds.
Petitioner contends that the determination is not supported *794by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kalwasinski v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- McNair v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Primo v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Moolenaar v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- London v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kilgore v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Calhoun v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Faraldo v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Houze v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Malone v. GiambrunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000