Legal Opinion

Faraldo v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 14, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a tier II hearing, petitioner was found guilty of interfering with employees and refusing to obey a direct order after a misbehavior report alleged that petitioner refused to get up to the morning alarm. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the detailed misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed and probative to constitute substantial evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Malik v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Berner v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burr v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Davis v. BezioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API