City of Philipsburg v. Weinstein
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Granite Cownty'; Theodore Brantby, Judge. Herman Weinstein was convicted of violating an ordinance of the city of Philipsburg in carrying on a pawnbroking business without a license. From the judgment and an order overruling his motion for a new trial, he appeals.
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from a judgment of the district court finding him guilty of a misdemeanor, and fining him five dollars, for having carried on and conducted the business of a pawnbroker without having first procured a license, as required by the ordinances of the city of Philips-burg, Montana. He also appeals from an order oyerruling his motion for a new trial.
1. This court cannot say that the evidence is insufficient to justify the finding of the court that the defendant was guilty of pawnbroking. There is substantial evidence on the part of the city tending to prove that defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tuttle v. Merchant's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Bozeman v. CadwellMontana Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Labbitt v. BunstonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Ivins v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Ivins v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 1958