Legal Opinion
Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Decided January 20, 2005No. 2966PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAPALINI, J.,
Defendant Philadelphia Housing Authority has filed a motion for partial summary judgment, contending that plaintiffs Harold Hurt Jr. and Philip Hurt have failed to set forth valid causes of action in their complaints alleging deprivation of their federal civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. Defendant does not contest plaintiffs’ state claims alleging negligence.
Plaintiffs are represented by David J. Alexander, Esquire, and defendant is represented by Brian J. Slipakoff, Esquire.
Both plaintiffs allege that, as minors, they were injured by exposure to lead-based paint.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Save Our Valley v. Sound TransitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Three Rivers Center For Independent Living, Inc. v. Housing Authority Of The City Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Perry v. Housing Authority Of The City Of CharlestonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dellita Johnson v. City of Detroit and City of Detroit Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Dellita Johnson v. City of Detroit and City of Detroit Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Johnson v. DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006