Legal Opinion

Baer v. City of Brookfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1963No. 23741PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The facts are not really in dispute. The disagreement arises from the amount of the award.

It is admitted that on November 22, 1959, the City of Brookfield, Missouri, was an employer, operating under the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Law, was fully insured by the State Automobile and Casualty Underwriters of Des Moines, Iowa; that on said date plaintiff Kenneth R. Baer sustained injuries by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as a volunteer fireman, and that notice and claim had been duly filed.

Claimant was…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noland v. George Tatum Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Dixon v. Postlewait Glass Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Martin v. Mid-America Farm Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Kowalski v. MG Metals and Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Enyard v. Consolidated UnderwritersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Brown v. Missouri Lumber Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Allen v. Dorothy's Laundry and Dry Cleaning Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API