Legal Opinion
Dodd v. Varady
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided March 16, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOMLIN, Presiding Judge, W.S.
This ease stems from a boating accident on the Tennessee River near Chattanooga involving the application of federal maritime law. Charles and Joan Dodd (hereafter “plaintiffs”) filed suit in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County against Mark Varady (hereafter “defendant”) for damages resulting from personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of consortium sustained by them in a boating accident on Lake Chickamauga. Defendant filed a counterclaim against Charles Dodd for damages to his boat. Following a jury trial a verdict was rendered in which it was stated that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Harrison v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- S. C. Loveland, Inc. v. East West Towing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- The Cornelius VanderbiltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Waste Management, Inc. v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Waste Management v. South Central BellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997