Legal Opinion

Joseph Gough v. Aledade, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 8, 2026No. 2:25-cv-13887Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH GOUGH, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-13887 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN ALEDADE, INC., Defendant. _____________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [ECF No. 9] I. INTRODUCTION BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff Joseph Gough’s Motion to Remand [ECF No. 9]. Upon review of the pleadings, record, and files herein, the Court finds that a hearing is not necessary to decide this matter and has determined the outcome on the briefs. See E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(f)(2). For the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Invst Financial Group, Inc. v. Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Cleveland Housing Renewal Project v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API