Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 25, 1995No. Civ. 94-875-MAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) brings this action for breach of contract against its insured, defendant U.S. Natural Resources, Inc. (“USNR”), seeking reimbursement for the deductible portion of a settlement by Hartford on a personal injury claim. The court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
The case is before me on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (## 17 and 30). After considering the parties’ arguments and the evidence, Hartford’s motion is GRANTED and USNR’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Dale E. Harper v. Clyde Wallingford Larry Kincheloe W.L. Kautsky an Unnamed Mailroom Staff Member at W.S.P., A/K/A "d.s."Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mid-Continent Casualty v. Greater Midwest BuildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019