Legal Opinion
Ragozzine v. Youngstown State University
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 24, 2014No. Case No. 4:13cv750PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Regarding ECF No. 53 ]
BENITA Y. PEARSON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants ' Youngstown State University (“YSU”), Cynthia Anderson and Karen Giorgetti (collectively “Defendants”). ECF No. 53. Plaintiff Frank Ragozzine responded, ECF No. 55, and Defendants replied, ECF No. 58. Defendants also filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation of Facts, ECF No. 52.
The Court has been advised, having reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, the applicable law and, at the request of Ra-gozzine, heard oral argument on…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank Ragozzine v. Youngstown State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Dawson v. Assured PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Gallo v. Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025