Altube v. Aguirre
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment against them upon a promissory note for $2,500, which judgment also decreed a foreclosure of a mortgage given as security therefor.
The only question presented by the appeal is: Was the debt barred by the statute of limitations? (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 337.) The trial court found that it was not barred. The evidence upon which this finding was based was admitted over the objection of defendants, and such evidence is attacked upon this appeal as irrelevant and immaterial and insufficient to support the finding even though properly admitted.
The note…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Clunin v. First Federal Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Barron v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Visher v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Farrell v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Buck v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Buck v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932