Legal Opinion

Dally v. Isaacson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1952No. 31935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

C. F. Dally and E. J. Beslow, doing business as Dally Construction & Engineering Co., hereafter referred to as Dally, were the successful bidders for the construction of a housing project for the army engineers at the Chief Joseph dam near Bridgeport, Washington.

A. B. Isaacson, doing business as Modern Manufacturing Company, hereafter referred to as Isaacson, was engaged in the business of manufacturing millwork.

Isaacson had studied the plans and specifications of the army engineers, and, upon learning that Dally was low bidder on the entire job, sent his bid on the millwork to Dally. A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Westland Construction Co. v. Chris Berg, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Sedro Veneer Co. v. KwapilWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bavaria Investment Co. v. Washington Brick, Lime & Sewer Pipe Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Carroll Construction Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Lewis v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. King Logging Co. v. ScalzoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Nephi Processing Plant, Inc., a Corporation v. H. A. Talbott and Margaret TalbottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API