Legal Opinion

Bronster v. United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1999No. 21130PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The defendant-appellant United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO (the UPW) appeals from (1) the orders of the circuit court (a) granting the plaintiff-ap-pellee Margery S. Bronster’s motion for summary judgment, (b) denying the UPW’s motions (i) to stay proceedings pending arbitration, (ii) to compel arbitration, and (iii) for summary judgment, and (2) the final judgment in favor of Bronster, in her official capacity as the state’s attorney general. This case arises out of Bronster’s prayer, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment that the Office of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Estate of Doe v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. First Hawaiian Bank v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Dines v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Guth v. FreelandHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hokama v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Arbitration Between UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, LOCAL 646 & State, Department of TransportationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API