Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. CFMOTO Powersports, Inc.
Clermont County Court of Common Pleas
Decided January 24, 2011No. 2009 CVH 1340PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Haddad, Judge.
{¶ 1} This matter came before the court pursuant to a partial motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed by the defendants, CFMOTO Powersports, Inc., HH Motor Sports, L.L.C., and Zhejiang CFMOTO Power Co., Ltd., on April 2, 2010. The defendants renewed their motion on June 17, 2010, after the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on June 10, 2010. The court held a hearing on the matter on August 16, 2010.
{¶ 2} The court would note that pursuant to an agreement discussed on the record in a separate hearing, held on May 18, 2010, the parties stipulated that the plaintiff, in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- No. 98-5136Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, IncorporatedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Robins v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Schumacher v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.