Legal Opinion

Mann v. Henderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1964No. 24PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate was a licensed pilot with 90 hours of flying time. On and prior to April 25, 1961, he was employed as a service attendant, mechanic’s helper, and pilot by the defendant Henderson who at the time was operating a taxi or charter flying service under the trade name, “Manteo Airport.” The defendant West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company owned a large tract of timber lands in Dare and Tyrrell Counties. Near these lands it maintained a landing strip for the use of planes on fire patrol.

On April 25, 1961, Pulp and Paper employed Henderson to assist in fighting a fire out of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lange v. Nelson-Ryan Flight Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Smith v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Jackson v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Morrison v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mabrey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Quadrini v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division, United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. O'Boyle Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. McDonnell v. Guilford County Tradewind Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. DiBelardino v. Lemmon Pharmacal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API