Legal Opinion

State v. Wilde

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1993No. CM92-0719; CA A76111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.155. We reverse.

The basis for defendant’s conviction was his violation of the conditions of a pretrial “home detention” release program. Under that program, defendant was prohibited from consuming alcohol and was required to obtain the authorization of his probation officer before leaving the premises. He failed to appear for a scheduled appointment and was later found intoxicated and causing a disturbance at the courthouse. On appeal, he contends that the state did not prove the elements of escape in the second degree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. TorgersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EsmondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. CroghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Curtiss v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API