Legal Opinion

State v. Esmond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 1994No. CM92-0565; CA A75640PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant was convicted of escape in the second degree, ORS 162.155(l)(c), after absconding from court-ordered home detention. We affirm.

On February 7, 1992, defendant pled guilty to two counts of menacing and was placed on probation. One of the conditions of probation required him to complete 90 days “in [Benton County Community Correction (BCCC)] home detention program subject to direction of BCCC[.]” On the 53rd day of his home detention, defendant left his residence without permission and then left town. When apprehended, he was charged with escaping from a correctional facility and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. TorgersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. WildeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. CroghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. CadgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API