Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luke v. Cataldi

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2005Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision affirming the trial court’s decision to dismiss Appellant’s complaint for failure to file a timely appeal of the Supervisors’ decision to grant conditional mining use permits in the above-captioned matter.

The majority opinion avers that in the case of procedural defects, the distinction between the enactment of an ordinance or amendment thereto, as in Schadler v. Zoning Hearing Board of Weisenberg Township, 578 Pa. 177, 850 A.2d 619 (2004), and the grant of a conditional use permit governed by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Krenzelak v. KrenzelakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Schadler v. Zoning Hearing Board of Weisenberg TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Roeder v. Hatfield Borough CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Hodge v. Zoning Hearing Board of West Bradford TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API