State Ex Inf. Ashcroft v. Riley
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
SEILER, Judge.
The Attorney General filed an original proceeding in quo warranto in this court, naming Arthur A. Riley, sheriff of Audrain County as respondent. The object of this proceeding is to secure a forfeiture of his office, oust him and declare the office vacant, for alleged official misconduct.
The information charges respondent with a number of violations of official duties, alleged to result in forfeiture of his office, pursuant to Section 106.220.1 Without taking the time and space to set forth those charges and related evidence which we do not believe warrant ouster, we instead set…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Danforth v. Independence Dodge, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- State on Information of McKittrick v. WhittleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Grace v. Missouri Gaming CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State ex inf. Fuchs v. FooteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.