Legal Opinion

In the Interest of B.R.G.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 2001No. 08-00-00132-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

Robin Lynn Geer appeals pro se from, the trial court’s order finding him liable for child support for his child, B.R.G., and finding he was not entitled to a bench warrant for purposes of testifying at the hearing on this suit affecting the parent-child relationship. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 25, 1999, the Texas Attorney General filed a petition to establish the parent-child relationship between B.R.G. and Geer. The petition sought testing to determine parentage, an order appointing conservators, an order concerning the child’s surname, and an order for medical support and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bailey v. Vanscot Concrete Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Armstrong v. Randle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Heine v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  2. Ex Parte Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  3. In Re Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  4. Ringer v. KimballCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. In the Interest of P.C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API