Legal Opinion
Tasin v. Bastress
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 11, 1925No. Appeals, 173, 174, 280, 281 and 282PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
The court below tried these five cases together, without a jury; judgments for plaintiffs were entered in two of them, and for defendant in the other three. Each of the losing parties prosecutes a separate appeal. But one opinion was delivered below, and one will suffice here.
In compromise of a suit, brought in the City of New York, by L. S. Walter and W. B. Faust against the defendant in these cases, he agreed with them that, if they would discontinue the suit, he would, inter alia, pay an outstanding indebtedness of $36,000,i — which plaintiffs owed to certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Womach v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State Hospital for Criminal Insane v. Consolidated Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Green v. BogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Blymire v. BoistleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
- Brill v. BrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Brobston v. Darby BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Jardel Co., Inc. v. Hirsch, Arkin, Pinehurst, Inc., a Penna. Corp., and Rudolph GuistiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Williams v. Paxson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.