Federal Insurance v. McCampbell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff Federal Insurance Company has no obligation to defend or indemnify the estate of its insured, Donald H. McCampbell, against either the claim of his spouse, Catherine Evans McCampbell, or the indemnity claim of the defendant The Hertz Corporation under two insurance policies issued by it, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated October 4,1996, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff is obligated to defend and indemnify them under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- United States Mortgage & Trust Co. v. RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Government Employees Insurance v. SheerinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Employers MutualAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Schwartz v. S. Lipkin & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HarkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006