Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Harkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant James J. Harkins, Jr., pursuant to a policy of automobile liability insurance, in an underlying action entitled Harkins v Harkins, pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under index No. 9666/04, the defendant Carol Harkins and the defendant James J. Harkins, Jr., separately appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated April 6, 2005, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff is obligated to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Yankelevitz v. Royal Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- American Transit Ins. v. AbdelghanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Government Employees Insurance v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Dempsey v. Consumers Distributing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metropolitan Group Property v. KimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Government Employees Ins. Co. v. AvilaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024