Legal Opinion

Esterly Harvesting Machine Co. v. Pringle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894No. 5596PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the district court of Perkins county. Tried below before Church, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Post, J.. This was an action of replevin in the district court of Perkins county, by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error, to recover possession of five Esterly harvesters and binders, seven Esterly mowers, and a miscellaneous lot of repairs and fixtures. The plaintiff’s general ownership of said property was conceded, but defendants claimed possession by virtue of a lien thereon for freight and storage, as will hereafter appear. A trial was had in the district court, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendants therein, and the cause was removed into this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ayres v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Reynolds v. NugentIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Hennessey v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McDonough v. SaundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Allen v. Farmers & Merchants BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Rhoads v. Columbia Fire Underwriters AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Selig v. Wunderlich Contracting CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API