Legal Opinion

People v. Suesser

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1901No. Crim. No. 670PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County and from an order denying a new trial. N. A. Dorn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple,j.

—The defendant was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to be hanged, and has appealed from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

The principal point relied upon for a reversal is the refusal of the court to grant a change of venue upon the showing made by the defendant. Section 1033 of the Penal Code directs the trial court to grant the change when it is made to appear that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the county, and when, from any cause, no jury can be obtained in the county where the action is pending. So far as this case is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. FredericksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Maine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. TidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. McCrackenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API