United States v. Paul Garnet Hill
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTER HERBERT RICE, Senior District Judge.
Defendant Paul Garnet Hill (“Hill”) pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which prohibits the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The district court sentenced him as an armed career criminal to a 188-month term of incarceration, in accordance with the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4B1.4. That statute imposes a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years on anyone who has been convicted of violating § 922(g) and has three previous convictions “for a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Nance v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Oscar FloresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Michael CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.