Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Garnet Hill

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2006No. 04-6206PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTER HERBERT RICE, Senior District Judge.

Defendant Paul Garnet Hill (“Hill”) pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which prohibits the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The district court sentenced him as an armed career criminal to a 188-month term of incarceration, in accordance with the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4B1.4. That statute imposes a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years on anyone who has been convicted of violating § 922(g) and has three previous convictions “for a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Nance v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Oscar FloresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Michael CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API