Legal Opinion

Klamm v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 24, 1986No. 59,367PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, J.:

Mid-Century Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s judgment which held that an exclusion in the uninsured motorist (UM) coverage of its policy did not apply to the policy owner, Richard Klamm.

The parties stipulated to the facts and submitted only questions of law for the trial court’s decision. Their stipulations and the record together disclose the following pertinent facts.

Richard Klamm bought an automobile insurance policy from Mid-Century which covered his 1980 Oldsmobile Toronado. The policy included uninsured motorist coverage. On July 15, 1983, Klamm bought a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clayton v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Hall v. MullenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Fancher v. Carson-Campbell, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Van Brunt v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Patrons Mutual Ins. Ass'n v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartee v. R.T.C. Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Farmers Insurance v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  3. Ball Ex Rel. Ball v. Midwestern InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. State v. DammanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Ryoko Ito v. Macro Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API