Lampkin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of using abusive language, to J. M. Hicks, under circumstances reasonably ealeulated to provoke a breach of the peace. The evidence shows that about the 9th of June, 1903, on a public road, between Dallas and Kleburg, appellant asked Hicks if he had not filed a petition with the county superintendent of public instruction protesting against the approval of a contract with Mrs. Lampkin (appellant’s wife) to teach the public school at Rylie. Hicks denied having done so. Appellant remarked, “You are a God damn dirty lying son of a bitch," and…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Orozco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Mauldin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Texas & N. O. R. v. BarhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Pointer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.