Legal Opinion

Dana Companies v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 14, 2011No. Nos. 108, 2011, 109, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice:

Defendants below Dana Companies (“Dana”) and Zoom Performance Products (“Zoom”) appeal from a Superior Court order denying their post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law or, alternatively, for a new trial. A Superior Court jury found those defendants partially liable for asbestos-related mesothelioma suffered by the decedents, Bruce Henderson (“Bruce”) and his mother, Elizabeth Henderson (“Elizabeth”) (collectively, the “Hendersons”). The trial court denied the defendants’ motions on the ground that the jury verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.

The jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Young v. FraseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  4. Burns v. Delaware Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corrina Foraker v. Jennifer Rife and Dave RifeDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2017
  2. Knecht v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
  3. Knecht v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
  4. Sherita Lowman v. Lonna Cheri Smith & Charles E. SmithDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API