Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Cofer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1938No. 8579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

The only issue on this appeal is whether or not Cofer & Cofer, as attorneys for appellant, were entitled under their written contract with him to recover as attorney’s fees one-half of the rents derived from’ property in Austin, Tex., involved in litigation wlierein they represented him. That litigation culminated in an appeal to this court in the case of Johnson v. Snaman, Tex.Civ.App., 76 S.W.2d 824, writ- refused.

The record in the instant case discloses that, after we had reversed and remanded the above-styled cause to the trial court with, instructions to foreclose the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Amsler v. D. S. Cage & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. American Ins. Union v. Allen.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Johnson v. SnamanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Laybourn v. Bray ShiffletCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. La Fleaur v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Duke v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Smith v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Van Dale v. KaronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Eberley v. First National Bank of StantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API