Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Snaman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 3, 1934No. 8000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

A. S. Johnson, Jr., son and sole heir of Kate S. Johnson, deceased, sued Max Snaman to cancel liens on certain property in the city of Austin, created by two deeds of trust executed by Kate S. Johnson during her lifetime, joined by Wm. H. Folts as substitute trustee, to secure two notes executed by her, payable to Max Snaman, aggregating the principal sum of $14,348. The defendant by cross-action sought to have his debt and lien established and foreclosed against A. S. Johnson, Jr., and against the estate of Kate S. Johnson; to have said property adjudged to belong to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boone & Scarborough v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lockridge v. McCommonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bracken v. BoundsTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Chestnutt v. GannTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cheveral v. McCormickTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lower Colorado River Authority v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Harris v. WareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Martinez v. Southwest Bitulithic Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Miller, Hiersche, Martens & Hayward, P.C. v. Bent Tree National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  5. Seguin State Bank & Trust Co. v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API