Potchasky v. Marshall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:.Harold Rushby made an agreement with defendants to sell a Maimón car belonging to them. He was to have for his commission all he could get for the car above $600. He was to have no other compensation and no allowance for expenses. He got the car at Plattsburgh and alone drove it to Mineville, where he was working in a garage. He kept the car in this garage. He lived in Witherbee. One evening he drove from the garage to Witherbee and, while returning to Mineville, the accident happened, the car he was driving coming into collision with plaintiff’s car in the highway. He took this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation of Long IslandNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Matter of Litts v. . Risley Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Baker v. . Allen Arnink Auto Renting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Magee v. Hargrove Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Taylor v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Whitehall Chevrolet Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Hodges v. WestCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.