Legal Opinion
Bowles v. City of Camden
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 2, 1998No. CIV.A. 96-4907 JEIPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS,'District Judge.
The instant dispute arises from the termination of plaintiff Carl Bowles (“Bowles”), Director of the Public Works Department of the City of Camden (“City”), by defendant Arnold Webster (‘Webster”), Mayor of the City. In addition to defendant Webster, plaintiff is suing the City, the individual members of Camden’s City Council, and Patrick Keating (“Keating”), the Business Administrator for the City. Presently before the Court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for retaliatory discharge under New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Caver v. City of TrentonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Kolb v. BurnsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Ivan v. County of MiddlesexDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Young v. Hobart West GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Donofry v. AUTONOTE SYSTEMS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.