Legal Opinion

United States v. May

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1885No. Law. No. 23,172Published

The Case is stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wylie

John Lang, by his will, bequeathed one-third of his property to his widow and the residue to his two sons, and appointed Philip May, one of the defendants, executor, who duly qualified, and letters testamentary were issued to him on the 20th of November, 1869. The defendant, Peter May, was one of his sureties. Among the assets of the estate was the note of Nicholas May, dated February 21, 1867, for $1,200, payable, to the order of John Lang, five years after date, with interest at six per cent, and secured by deed of trust upon real estate. The note was good and collectable on maturity, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gable v. CoaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Watkins' Adm'rs v. State ex rel. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1830
  3. Citizens' National Bank v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  4. Kirby v. State ex rel. PascaultCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API