Legal Opinion
Flood v. Graham
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 15, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions
This case was decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.
The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the court below, instituted an action at law against the defendant in error in which the following declaration was filed:
“And now comes E. O. Flood, the plaintiff, by Wall & McKay, his attorneys, and complains of John A. Graham, the defendant.
*208For that whereas, on or about the 15th day of June, A. D. 1906, the said plaintiff purchased of and from the said defendant for the sum of Thirty-eight Hundred Sixty - four ($3861.00) dollars, certain lands situate in the County of DeSoto of the State of Florida, and a more particular description of which is to be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mitchell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Consumers Gas Trust Co. v. LittlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Seitzinger ex rel. Drinkel v. WeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
- VanNess v. Royal Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- R. H. Gore v. General Properties CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Abstract Co. v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Brewster v. WegmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942