VanNess v. Royal Phosphate Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division B. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Citrus County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHockek, J.
On the 27th day of February, A. D., 1900, the plaintiff in error joined by his wife, executed a deed to the plaintiff in error, in which he granted, bargained, sold and conveyed to the defendant in error 145 acres of land more or less lying in Citrus county, Florida, together with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging. In this deed' the plaintiff in error and his wife, the parties of the first part, “do hereby bind themselves and their heirs, executors and administrators to warrant and forever defend the title to said premises unto the said party of the second…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kutz v. McCuneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Janes v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Memmert v. McKeenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Patterson v. ArthursSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
- Brown v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Vincent v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- R. H. Gore v. General Properties CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Kunkle v. BeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1913
- Pasco County v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.