In re the Estate of Hayward
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Despite the obvious inference from Kipling’s familiar dictum, the common law, as presently administered, recognizes no presumption of survivorship where a man and a woman die as the result of a common disaster.
“It is true that the Roman law did recognize a presumption of survivorship in such cases, viz., that the one presumably stronger by reason of age survived the one presumably weaker. And the French laws made like distinction between the sexes, presuming, in the absence of any evidence, that the male survived the female.” (Balder v. Middeke, 92 Ill. App. 227, 229.) In some…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ruppert v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Newell v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- The People v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Frazer v. South & North Ala. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. EuloNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bierbrauer v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- In re the Estate of ShupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Erin Wine & Liquor Store, Inc. v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- In re the Estate of BurzaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.