Legal Opinion

Brandmire v. Kroger Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 18, 2014No. 3:12-CV-670-TAV-CCSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge.

This civil action is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 10]. Plaintiff has responded [Doc. 11], and defendant has filed a reply to plaintiffs response [Doc. 12]. The Court has carefully considered the motion and the record and, for the reasons stated below, finds that defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.

I. Background

Plaintiff, Lani Brandmire, began working for defendant, The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”), in August 2006 and was employed there until her termination in September 2012 [Doc. 10-1 p. 3].…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Masuma Khan v. Kristi Noem, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Mohamed Abdikarim v. Bruce Scott, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  3. Scott Foltz v. Barnhart Crane and Rigging CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API