Legal Opinion

Superscope, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 31, 1988No. Court No. 85-3-00328Published

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Chief Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain unas-sembled cabinets imported from New Zealand, containing glass panels manufactured in the United States, and classified by the Customs Service as "furniture, and parts thereof, not specially provided for.”

*284The imported merchandise was entered at the port of Los Ange-les, California, and was classified by the Customs Service under item 727.35 or item 727.55, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as "furniture, and parts thereof, not specially provided for,”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Falls Riverway Realty, Inc. v. City of Niagara FallsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Gumer v. Shearson, Hammill & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Flora v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API