Legal Opinion

City of Eaton Rapids ex rel. Snyder v. Stump

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Debt by the city of Eaton Rapids, for the use and benefit of Perry O. Snyder, against F. Marion Stump, as principal, and James B. Bradley and Jay W. Vaughan, as sureties, upon an official bond. From a judgment for defendants on demurrer to the declaration, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Defendant Stump, on the 26th day of April, 1898, was duly elected to the office of marshal of the city of Eaton Rapids by the common council. He, as principal, and defendants Bradley and Vaughan, as sureties, executed a bond, running to the city of Eaton Rapids, in the penal sum of $1,000, as required by the charter of that city; the condition of the bond being:

“That if the said F. Marion Stump shall well and faithfully in all things discharge the duties of his said office according to law, and shall faithfully disburse all moneys that may come into his hands by virtue of his *2said office,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corporation of Washington Ex Rel. McCue v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Ing v. State ex rel. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  3. State ex rel. Mayor of Baltimore v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sunter v. FraserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Burkland v. BlissSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Carr v. City of Knoxville ex rel. MondayTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. American Indemnity Co. v. YochamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API