Legal Opinion

Burkland v. Bliss

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. File No. 7431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action for the recovery of damages against William Bliss, Plenry A. Walz, and the sureties on their official bonds and against Carl Viers. After reciting the election and the qualification of defendant Viers, as mayor of the city of Vermillion, the appointment and qualification of defendants Bliss and Walz, as police officers of that city, and the execution and delivery of official bonds by the police officers, the complaint alleges that Policeman Walz, while acting under the direction and with the knowledge and consent of the officers of the city of Vermillion and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lammon v. FeusierSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Gomez v. ScanlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lee v. CharmleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Turner v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Taylor v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Phelps v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Witcher v. City of FairlawnOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. McGillivray v. SiedschlawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. County of Minnehaha Ex Rel. Willadsen v. WilladsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Perry Ex Rel. Perry v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API