Mashburn v. North Arkansas Highway Improvement District No. 3
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant was not entitled to recover for preliminary work at any place other than on the road as created by the act. 59 Ark. 344; 31 Ark. 720; 163 Ark. 269. The commissioners did not have authority to authorize the survey for construction of new roads. 89 Ark. 513;118 Ark. 119; 148 Ark. 365. See also 142 Ark. 509;133 Ark. 491. North Arkansas Highway Improvement District No. 3 is composed of territory embraced in the counties of Sharp, Lawrence, Izard and Fulton, and was created by act No. 32 (unpublished), approved February 3, 1920, of an extraordinary session of the General Assembly. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Road Improvement District No. 1 v. GloverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Cox v. Road Improvement District No. 8Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Rayder v. WarrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Watkins v. GriffithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Pritchett v. Road Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sims v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Matlock v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926