Legal Opinion

Douglas v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 26, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Associate Justice.

Charles Lamár Douglas was convicted of the murder in the first degree of one Jack Johnson and has appealed.

The evidence on behalf of the State is entirely circumstantial.

Numerous assignments of error relate to the admission, over defendant’s objections, of evidence of statements made by others in the presence of the accused.

The law on this subject is stated in prior decisions of this Court as follows:

“In Autrey v. State, 94 Fla. 229, 114 So. 244, 245, Mr. Justice Strum stated the rule to be:
“ ‘Where, on being accused of crime, with full liberty to speak, one remains…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. State v. LovellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Wauchula Manufacturing & Timber Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Tacoronte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API