Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
In a declaratory judgment action, the district court ruled that an allegation against the insured for trespass by refusing to remove an outdoor advertising sign was arguably within the scope of an insurance policy’s coverage for “wrongful entry or eviction or other invasion of the right of private occupancy.” We affirm the court’s declaration that the insurer had a duty to defend until the trespass claim was dismissed, but reverse and remand for reconsideration of the court’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs.
FACTS
James and Keith Franklin own Franklin Outdoor…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Keene, New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.