Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1997No. C6-96-1684, C6-96-1748Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In a declaratory judgment action, the district court ruled that an allegation against the insured for trespass by refusing to remove an outdoor advertising sign was arguably within the scope of an insurance policy’s coverage for “wrongful entry or eviction or other invasion of the right of private occupancy.” We affirm the court’s declaration that the insurer had a duty to defend until the trespass claim was dismissed, but reverse and remand for reconsideration of the court’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs.

FACTS

James and Keith Franklin own Franklin Outdoor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Keene, New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API