Legal Opinion

Aponte v. City of Columbus

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 2000No. A00A1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

In a prior action concerning the real property at issue in this case, we held that the legislature had not endowed the Columbus Airport Commission with the authority to condemn property for airport purposes. In so holding, however, we noted that Columbus, a consolidated city-county government, has the constitutional right to exercise the power of eminent domain. Columbus then filed a declaratory judgment action against the owners, Antonio Lopez Aponte and Catherine E. Lopez, seeking access to the property in order to conduct a pre-condemnation survey and appraisal. Columbus had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clein v. KaplanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Department of Transportation v. Del-Cook Timber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Hall v. TrubeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Plaza Properties, Ltd. v. Prime Business Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Zywiciel v. Historic Westside Village Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Morris v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Ware v. Henry County Water & Sewerage AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. v. Kingdom Adventures, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API